Radicalisation Research

  • Home
  • About
  • Research
    • De-radicalisation
    • Discussions on Policy
    • Groups
    • Ideologies
    • Integration
    • Policy documents
    • Radicalisation
      • Causes of radicalisation
      • Pathways to radicalisation
    • Regions
      • UK
      • World
    • Terms and Definitions
    • Think-tank
  • Guides
  • Debate
  • Contact
  • Links

Fishermen Or Swarm Dynamics? Should We Understand Jihadist Online-Radicalization As A Top-Down Or Bottom-Up Process?

  • by Linda Schlegel, Till Baaken
  • in Discussions on Policy · Research
  • — 9 Feb, 2018

journal-for-deradicalization_blog-235x350Journal abstract

The internet has profoundly changed the way we communicate, including how jihadist groups seek to reach Western audiences with their propaganda strategies. Cases of believed online-radicalization call for a re-evaluation of radicalization processes, previously thought to depend on face-to-face interactions. Based on the Hoffman-Sageman debate on whether top-down or bottom-up processes drive terrorism, this essay explores both social movement and organizational approaches to understand online-radicalization. Do jihadist organizations such as Al-Qaeda and IS act as ‘fishermen’, actively engaging in the radicalization processes of individual recruits, or is radicalization driven by social group dynamics with little organizational involvement? Essentially, the larger question is: What role do organizational structures play for radicalization in times of ‘virtual jihad’? Bottom-up radicalization processes are facilitated online, because the conditions for Sageman’s ‘bunch of guys’ are replicated by the characteristics of virtual communication: an echo chamber effect causes frame-alignment through repetition and enables ‘digital natives’ to communicate claims that resonate with other ‘digital natives’. Top-down structures are influential, because organizations continue to employ sophisticated propaganda development, preachers and special recruiters or ‘fishermen’. The article finds evidence for both schools of thought and concludes that the internet facilitates both types of radicalization mechanisms. Only a holistic strategy will be successful in battling online-radicalization and must include both targeting direct channels through which the organizations execute control over recruits, and breaking the echo chamber created by social movement dynamics in the virtual world. While countermeasures need to include the provision of alternative social narratives and the utilization of ‘digital natives’ to make counter-messages more effective, organizational structures need to be tackled simultaneously, not only by identifying and arresting preachers and recruiters, but also through stronger internet governance tools and collaboration with social media companies.

Share
0
  • Journal : Journal for Deradicalization
  • Author : Till Baaken, Linda Schlegel
  • Date : 2017
  • Volume : 3(6)
  • Link : https://goo.gl/W1CHgj

Tags: jihadistonline radicalisation

  • Previous story The Interaction of Extremist Propaganda and Anger as Predictors of Violent Responses
  • Next story The War of Words with Terrorism: An Assessment of Three Approaches to Pursue and Prevent

Related articles

  • The Impact of Jihadist Foreign Fighters on Indigenous Secular-Nationalist Causes: Contrasting Chechnya and Syria 23 Feb, 2015
  • Brothers, Believers, Brave Mujahideen: Focusing Attention on the Audience of Violent Jihadist Preachers 23 Nov, 2016
  • Exploring the “Demand Side” of Online Radicalization: Evidence from the Canadian Context 12 Nov, 2018
  • The Rise of Muslim Foreign Fighters: Islam and the Globalization of Jihad 15 Aug, 2014
    • Recent Posts
    • Tags
    • Studies in Conflict & TerrorismConfronting Apocalyptic Terrorism: Lessons from France and Japan15 February, 2019
    • terrorism-and-political-violenceCaribbean Taliban: Cuban American Terrorism in the 1970s13 February, 2019
    • Studies in Conflict & TerrorismTesting Transitions: Extremist Prisoners Re-Entering Indonesian Society8 February, 2019
    • Pakistan The Taliban, Al Qaeda, and the Rise of TerrorismPakistan: The Taliban, Al Qaeda, and the Rise of Terrorism6 February, 2019
    • Afghanistan al-qaeda british-muslims counter-terrorism countering violent extremism Criminology CVE deradicalisation disengagement egypt europe extremism far-right foreign fighters fundamentalism gender government-policy ideology internet iraq ISIS islam Islamic-State islamism jihad jihadism lone-actor middle-east northern-ireland Open Access prevent-strategy propaganda Radicalisation radicalization recruitment religion religion-and-violence schools social media syria terrorism uk uk-government-policy united-states violence-and-religion
  • Subscribe to our Newsletter


  • Categories

    • Debate (77)
    • Featured (3)
    • Guides (9)
    • Research (994)
      • De-radicalisation (97)
      • Discussions on Policy (96)
      • Groups (210)
      • Ideologies (268)
      • Integration (4)
      • Policy documents (12)
      • Prevention (29)
      • Radicalisation (322)
        • Causes of radicalisation (87)
        • Pathways to radicalisation (60)
      • Regions (507)
        • UK (92)
        • World (419)
      • Terms and Definitions (27)
      • Think-tank (7)
    • Uncategorized (6)
  • Tags

    Afghanistan al-qaeda british-muslims counter-terrorism countering violent extremism Criminology CVE deradicalisation disengagement egypt europe extremism far-right foreign fighters fundamentalism gender government-policy ideology internet iraq ISIS islam Islamic-State islamism jihad jihadism lone-actor middle-east northern-ireland Open Access prevent-strategy propaganda Radicalisation radicalization recruitment religion religion-and-violence schools social media syria terrorism uk uk-government-policy united-states violence-and-religion
  • Home
  • Research
  • Discussions on Policy
  • Fishermen Or Swarm Dynamics? Should We Understand Jihadist Online-Radicalization As A Top-Down Or Bottom-Up Process?
  • Recent Posts

    • Confronting Apocalyptic Terrorism: Lessons from France and Japan
    • Caribbean Taliban: Cuban American Terrorism in the 1970s
    • Testing Transitions: Extremist Prisoners Re-Entering Indonesian Society
    • Pakistan: The Taliban, Al Qaeda, and the Rise of Terrorism
    • Dissident Irish Republicanism
  • @radicalisation on Twitter

    Tweets by @Radicalisation
  • Supported By

    Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats | ESRC | Lancaster University | Arts & Humanities Research Council
  • Home
  • About
  • Research
    • De-radicalisation
    • Discussions on Policy
    • Groups
    • Ideologies
    • Integration
    • Policy documents
    • Radicalisation
      • Causes of radicalisation
      • Pathways to radicalisation
    • Regions
      • UK
      • World
    • Terms and Definitions
    • Think-tank
  • Guides
  • Debate
  • Contact
  • Links

© Copyright Radicalisation Research / Our Use of Cookies
millipedia :: ethical digital